Mechanical properties of cracked teeth with different dental materials and crown parameters: An in vitro proof-of-concept.

OBJECTIVE: This work analyzed and compared the mechanical properties of identical cracked tooth models treated with different materials and crown parameters. Thus, to provide dentists with a more structured way to select materials and geometric parameters and determine the strongest restoration model for cracked teeth. METHODS: This work used finite element analysis (FEA). We applied 25 restorative models, including five restorative materials, and three preparation parameters. Seven mechanical properties of the cracked tooth preparation were analyzed using correlation analysis. RESULTS: The highest lifetime of the cracked preparation was obtained for crowns with a 5° of polymerization, width = 0.8 mm, and a length offset of 0.2 mm. The highest lifetime was obtained with ZC crown material, but the least deformation of the cracked tip was obtained with LU material. SIGNIFICANCE: The results showed that the larger MOE material for the crown and a reasonable increase in the thickness and length of the crown is a favorable method to prevent further cracks to extend. This FEA study, thereby forming a novel basis for clinical guidance as to preparation of dental crowns applicable to cracked teeth.

Diagnostic and treatment preferences for cracked posterior teeth.

BACKGROUND: Longitudinal cracks in teeth are common and often present challenges in diagnosis and management. This study investigated the preferred diagnostic process and treatment modalities for these cracked teeth. METHODS: Dentists currently registered with Dental Board of Australia and practising within Australia were invited to complete an online Qualtrics-based survey on their perspectives on the presentations, diagnosis, and treatment preferences for cracked teeth. RESULTS: Of respondents, 56.8% chose to place an indirect cuspal-coverage restoration on an asymptomatic cracked vital tooth. When the tooth was mildly cold sensitive, direct cuspal-coverage restoration was favoured (64.9%), while 36.8% preferred placing an orthodontic band in a tooth with biting pain. Respondents had higher odds of recommending indirect restoration when CAD-CAM milling was available on-site or magnification was routinely used, regardless of presenting symptoms. Almost half (46.8%) preferred to extract if the tooth undergoing root canal treatment had a crack with a 5 mm probing pocket depth. Most (71.4%) demonstrated a poor understanding of cracked tooth biomechanics. CONCLUSION: Australian dentists varied in their diagnostic and treatment preferences for cracked teeth, reflecting a need for more well-controlled clinical studies in the diagnostic process, clinical biomechanics and treatment modalities for these teeth. © 2023 Australian Dental Association.

Characteristics of Cracked Teeth with Reversible Pulpitis After Orthodontic Banding-A Prospective Cohort Study.

INTRODUCTION: Cracked teeth with reversible pulpitis can be managed with orthodontic bands in the interim before definitive restorations. The aim of this study was to determine short-term outcomes of these teeth following orthodontic band placement. The time taken for definitive pulp diagnoses after orthodontic band placement and associated prognostic factors was also analyzed. METHODS: One hundred twenty-five patients with a cracked tooth with reversible pulpitis each were recruited. Preoperative data including patient and tooth factors were collected. Cracked teeth were banded and reviewed until symptoms resolved before referral for coronal coverage. Kaplan-Meier and Cox analyses were performed to analyze pulp survival of these teeth. Prognostic factors were investigated using Pearson's chi-square and Student's t-test. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-two cracked teeth were analyzed. One hundred thirteen (92.6%) teeth had the pulpitis resolved within 2 months (median 40.0; interquartile range 28-61). The median time taken for progression to irreversible pulpitis or pulp necrosis for teeth that required root canal treatment was 3 months (median 90.0; interquartile range 68-110). No prognostic factors were associated with the resolution of pulpal symptoms. However, higher preoperative triggered pain scores (P < .05, hazards ratio 1.547) and absence of a distal marginal ridge crack (P < .05, hazards ratio 0.638) were correlated with a longer duration before definitive pulp diagnoses. CONCLUSION: Following orthodontic band placement, a normal pulp diagnosis was achieved in 92.6% of cracked teeth with preoperative reversible pulpitis. Definitive pulp diagnoses could be determined in approximately 2 months. Teeth with higher preoperative triggered pain scores may require a longer review period.

Therapeutic strategy for cracked teeth.

The management of cracked teeth represents a difficulty because their diagnosis is complex and there is no consensus concerning their treatment. The present article explains this pathology within enamel and dentin and also focuses on the clinical consequences of crack development in dental tissue. As cracks have both biologic and mechanical implications, a complete review of the literature on the subject has enabled the development of a comprehensive diagnostic approach to identify cracked teeth and optimize their management. The elements of diagnosis are the bite test, transillumination, the pulp sensitivity test, the periodontal test, radiologic examinations, removal of existing restorations, and the use of quantitative light-induced fluorescence. Finally, the management of biologic and mechanical imperatives relating to the treatment of cracked teeth has allowed the proposal of a reliable and reproducible therapeutic strategy based on two pillars: the arrest of bacterial infiltration using immediate dentin sealing, and the limitation of crack propagation using relative cuspal coverage. In this article, the proposed clinical protocol is explained through the use of a decision map and is illustrated by a clinical case example.

Treatment of cracked teeth: A comprehensive narrative review.

OBJECTIVES: The term "cracked tooth" is used to describe an incomplete fracture initiated from the crown and progressing towards a subgingival direction. Despite the high prevalence of cracked teeth and their frequent association with symptoms and pulpal or periapical pathoses, there is still no consensus in the literature with regard to their restorative and endodontic management. Therefore, the aim of this narrative review was to evaluate the most relevant research and provide an up-to-date comprehensive overview regarding the treatment of cracked teeth. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An electronic literature search was carried out in MEDLINE (via Ovid), Embase (via Ovid), Scopus, and Web of Science as well as several "Grey literature" sources up to February 22nd 2022 using a combination of pre-specified 'free-text' terms (keywords) and "subject headings." The search process was supplemented by handsearching in relevant dental journals and reference lists. This narrative review focused on clinical follow-up studies (observational or interventional studies, case series/reports), laboratory studies and systematic reviews written in English language that reported data on treatment of permanent cracked teeth. The selection of relevant studies was carried out by two reviewers (AK and DG) working independently in two consecutive stages: title/abstract screening and full-text retrieval. Any discrepancies in the study selection were resolved by discussion between the reviewers. RESULTS: In total, 64 articles were selected for inclusion in this narrative review. CONCLUSIONS: Cracked teeth with normal pulp or reversible pulpitis have exhibited high pulp and tooth survival rates by the provision of direct or indirect composite restorations. Besides, recent data favour monitoring, especially in the absence of symptoms or compromised tooth structure. When endodontic intervention is required, current evidence suggests that along with appropriate restorative management, outcomes of cracked teeth may be comparable to those of non-cracked root filled teeth.

Onset and resolution of pain among treated and untreated posterior teeth with a visible crack: Three-year findings from the national dental practice-based research network.

OBJECTIVE: Cracked teeth may be associated with pain, especially biting pain, and to a lesser degree cold and spontaneous pain.  Described are how commonly these pains remain constant, develop, or resolve over time, none of which have been well-described, especially among untreated cracked teeth. METHODS: Cracked teeth from the Cracked Tooth Registry (CTR) study were followed for 3 years.  Assessments of cold, biting, and spontaneous pain and treatments performed were completed at enrollment (Y0) and at each annual recall visit. RESULTS: 209 practitioners enrolled 2,858 patients, each with a visible crack on a posterior tooth; 2601 (91%) patients attended at least one recall visit. Overall, 960 (37%) were treated, primarily with crowns. Among both treated and untreated cracked teeth with biting pain or spontaneous pain at Y0, the vast majority (92-99%) had their pain resolved by the time of a recall visit and 85-93% remained pain-free after initial resolution. The observations for cold pain were similar: 68% (untreated) and 78% (treated) became free of cold pain at some point during follow-up, and 84% of these stayed free of cold pain after initial resolution. Few teeth developed biting or spontaneous pain (4-8%) and 44-67% of these had pain resolution during the follow-up period. CONCLUSION: In this study, treatment resolved a preponderance of pain associated with a cracked tooth.  Pain was also resolved for most untreated cracked teeth, especially biting pain, and to a lesser degree spontaneous and cold pain, although not to the same degree as with the treated cracked teeth.

The Correlation of Crack Lines and Definitive Restorations with the Survival and Success Rates of Cracked Teeth: A Long-term Retrospective Clinical Study.

INTRODUCTION: Cracked teeth frequently require protective adhesive restorations. This long-term, longitudinal retrospective clinical study aimed to evaluate the factors influencing the success and survival rates of cracked teeth with crack lines (CLs) in different directions when restored early with onlays or full-coverage crowns. METHODS: The dental records of 71 patients with a total of 86 cracked teeth with different pulpal and periapical diagnoses and with follow-ups spanning over 1-11 years were included. Data regarding the demographics; clinical symptoms and signs; bruxism; occlusal interferences; eating habits; pulpal and periapical diagnoses; number, direction, location, and extent of CLs; probing depth; and coronary condition before and after the placement of definitive restorations were collected. Univariate associations between tooth survival and explanatory variables were assessed. The long-term survival rate was estimated using Kaplan-Meier analysis and the log-rank test. A multivariate analysis was performed using Cox regression analysis. RESULTS: The overall success rate was 93.0%, and the overall survival estimates of cracked teeth restored early were 98.6%, 94.9%, and 55.9% at the 1-, 5-, and 11-year follow-ups, respectively. The direction of the CLs did not influence the survival of the tooth. No significant association was observed between the type of tooth, probing depth, root canal treatment, and tooth loss (P > .05). The multivariate analysis showed that previously treated cracked teeth (P < .05), the provision of onlay restorations (P < .05), and the placement of posts (P < .05) had higher correlations with tooth loss. Additionally, the placement of full-coverage crowns resulted in lower tooth loss compared with the placement of onlays (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Previous endodontic treatment in teeth that subsequently develop CLs has a negative impact on the survival rate of the teeth. Moreover, early placement of full-coverage crowns should be implemented for cracked teeth regardless of the direction or the number of CLs because it is associated with a higher cracked tooth survival rate.

Outcomes of treatment and monitoring of posterior teeth with cracks: three-year results from the National Dental Practice-Based Research Network.

OBJECTIVES: To describe treatment and monitoring outcomes of posterior teeth with cracks at baseline followed in the National Dental Practice-Based Research Network for up to three years. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two hundred and nine dentists enrolled a convenience sample of 2,858 patients, each with a posterior tooth with at least one visible crack and followed them for three years. Characteristics at the patient, tooth, and crack level were recorded at baseline and at annual recall visits. Data on all teeth referred for extraction were reviewed. Data on all other teeth, treated or monitored, seen at one or more recall visits were reviewed for evidence of failure (subsequent extraction, endodontics, or recommendation for a re-treatment). RESULTS: The survival rate for teeth with cracks at baseline exceeded 98% (only 37 extractions), and the failure rate for teeth that were treated restoratively was only 14%. Also, only about 14% of teeth recommended at baseline for monitoring were later recommended to be treated, and about 6.5% of teeth recommended for monitoring at baseline were later treated without a specific recommendation. Thus, about 80% of teeth recommended at baseline for monitoring continued with a monitoring recommendation throughout the entire three years of the study. Treatment failures were associated with intracoronal restorations (vs. full or partial coverage) and male patients. CONCLUSIONS: In this large 3-year practice-based study conducted across the USA, the survival rate of posterior teeth with a visible crack exceeded 85%. Clinical relevance Dentists can effectively evaluate patient-, tooth-, and crack-level characteristics to determine which teeth with cracks warrant treatment and which only warrant monitoring.

Review of Cracked Tooth Syndrome: Etiology, Diagnosis, Management, and Prevention.

Cracked tooth syndrome refers to a series of symptoms caused by cracked teeth. This article reviews the current literature on cracked tooth syndrome from four aspects, etiology, diagnosis, management, and prevention, to provide readers integrated information about this. The article begins with an introduction to the odontiatrogenic factors and then covers the noniatrogenic factors that induce cracked tooth syndrome. While the former discusses inappropriate root canal therapy and improper restorative procedures, the latter covers the topics such as the developmental and functional status of cracked tooth syndrome. This is then followed by the description of common clinical diagnosis methods, the prospects of new technologies, and summaries of current clinical management methods, including immediate management and direct and indirect restoration. In the final section, preventive methods and their importance are proposed, with the aim of educating the common population.

The Effectiveness of a Quantitative Light-induced Fluorescent Device for the Diagnosis of a Cracked Tooth: A Case Report.

Diagnosing a cracked tooth is a challenge for dental clinicians. This report describes the use of a quantitative light-induced fluorescent (QLF) device that detects fluorescence reactions with visible light (405 nm) to visually identify microscopic tooth cracks during the diagnosis and treatment of cracked teeth that caused pulp disease. Fluorescence images of the occlusal surface, before and after removal of the restoration, and inside of the access cavity for root canal treatment were obtained using an intraoral capture-type QLF device (Q-ray penC; AIOBIO, Seoul, Korea). The device provided visual information such as enhanced magnification and fluorescent images to identify cracks on the exterior of the tooth, around restorations, and inside the cavity after removal of the restoration by a simple image capture process. The device was able to demonstrate the existence of the crack line and to predict the depth of cracks during treatment.The QLF device showed a potential benefit in the diagnosis and characterization, including the location and depth, of tooth cracks.

Management of cracked teeth: Perspectives of general dental practitioners and specialists.

OBJECTIVES: The main aim of this study was to compare how general dental practitioners (GDPs), endodontists and prosthodontists diagnose, prognosticate, and treat cracked teeth. The secondary aim was to highlight factors influencing GDPs' referral practices of cracked teeth to specialists. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Questionnaires were used to collect information from GDPs, prosthodontists, and endodontists, on their use of diagnostic methods to identify cracked teeth, prognostication, and their management and referral practices for cracked teeth. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the quantitative data. Pearson's Chi-Square test or Fisher's Exact test was applied to categorical variables while Kruskal-Wallis or Spearman's correlation coefficient was applied to continuous variables (p <0.05). Content analysis was performed for qualitative data. RESULTS: 207 dentists responded, resulting in a response rate of 83.5%. Endodontists used more diagnostic tools as compared to prosthodontists and GDPs. For pulpally involved cracked teeth, endodontists were more likely to recommend root canal treatment (RCT) and cuspal coverage compared to extraction, followed by prosthodontists then GDPs. Main reasons for referral of cracked teeth to specialists include uncertainty in diagnosis, difficulty in crack visualization after endodontic access, and cracked teeth indicated for RCT. CONCLUSION: GDPs, prosthodontists, and endodontists differ in terms of their diagnosis, prognostication, and treatment of cracked teeth. GDPs refer cracked teeth to specialists due to challenges faced in diagnosis and treatment. Future research and education are required to provide evidence-based guidelines in the management of cracked teeth so that patients with cracked teeth can receive standardized care.

Survival and prognostic factors of managing cracked teeth with reversible pulpitis: A 1- to 4-year prospective cohort study.

AIM: This prospective clinical study evaluated the clinical performance of managing cracked teeth with reversible pulpitis through a combination of internal and external splinting and investigated factors that can affect pulp survival after splinting. METHODOLOGY: Thirty-four teeth diagnosed with cracks and reversible pulpitis were enrolled and treated with bidirectional crack splinting: 1) immediate splinting with a stainless-steel band, 2) internal splinting with crack line removal and resin filling and 3) external splinting with a temporary crown followed by final crown placement. If the symptoms remained/recurred, root canal treatment was performed. Patients were followed up at 3, 6 and 12 months, then annually thereafter. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis to calculate the survival of the treated teeth and Cox univariate proportional hazards regression model to investigate prognostic factors were performed. RESULTS: Twenty-nine (97%) teeth were followed up for up to 4 years. The pulp survival rate was 72% after banding and 91% after final crown cementation. No tooth was extracted (100% tooth survival rate). In the univariate Cox proportional hazard test, pain on percussion was the only statistically significant factor (hazard ratio = 11.77). Teeth with pain on percussion at the first visit had a pulp survival rate of 46% during the follow-up period. In comparison, their counterparts without pain had a 94% pulp survival rate. CONCLUSIONS: Bidirectional splinting successfully managed cracked teeth with reversible pulpitis. Pain on percussion (mechanical allodynia) may be an important factor in deciding whether to attempt root canal treatment on symptomatic cracked teeth. A step-by-step approach with bidirectional crack splinting should be encouraged for a cracked tooth with a vital pulp without mechanical allodynia rather than pre-emptive root canal treatment.

Repair of teeth with cracks in crowns and roots: An observational clinical study.

AIM: This retrospective observational study investigated the survival rate of teeth with radicular cracks that were restored using composite materials. METHODOLOGY: The study was approved by the Ethical Committee of Sistema Sanitario Nazionale (prot. N°2370CELazio1), Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT04430205. Between 1991 and 2019, 87 teeth with radicular cracks (87 patients [46 men, 41 women, mean age 50.2 years]) were treated with adhesive composite restorations. Forty-five cracks were observed in the maxillary posterior teeth (molars and premolars), 40 in the mandibular posterior teeth and only two cracks in the anterior teeth, both in maxilla. Based on the depth of the crack, teeth were categorized as proximal radicular cracked teeth (PRCT), in which the fracture line was restricted within the pulpal floor or the coronal one-third of the root and deep radicular cracked teeth (DRCT), in which the fracture line extended to the middle and apical thirds of the root canal up to the apex. Bone loss/recovery was evaluated radiographically at 1-year follow-up. All patients were treated using surgical microscopy by the same operator. Logistic regression analysis was performed to determine independent predictors of extraction. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used to analyse PRCT and DRCT. RESULTS: Among 87 cracked teeth, 66 were molars, 19 premolars and 2 incisors. Fifty-two were DRCT, 35 were PRCT, 46 had a periodontal probing defect. Patients were followed up for a mean of 66.9 months (standard deviation 44.6, min 1 to max 172). Lack of probing depth was a significant protective factor against extraction (odds ratio [OR] 0.027, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.003-0.27, p < .05), whereas further bone loss (OR 10.63, 95% CI 2.08-54.36, p < .05) was a risk factor for extraction. More than 50% of teeth treated with the adhesive protocol were functional (46 of 87 teeth [χ2 test], p < .05) at 5-year follow-up. Among the PRCT group, a 78% survival rate at 5 years was found, while among the DRCT group, a 58% survival rate was found. CONCLUSION: Composite resin restorations resulted in tooth survival in >50% of patients; 85.4% of PRCT and 61.5% of DRCT were functional after 5 years of follow-up.

Cracked Tooth Syndrome: Assessment, Prognosis and Predictable Management Strategies.

Cracked tooth syndrome (CTS) is a common presentation in general practice. The diagnosis and management of teeth with CTS may be difficult due to the unknown extent of the crack. This article reviews the aetiology, diagnosis, management and prognosis of teeth with CTS. A thorough examination is required to effectively assess CTS. Intervention should aim to relieve symptoms and brace the remaining tooth structure effectively against further flexion. Restored teeth with CTS have a guarded prognosis due to the risk of further crack propagation, but the chances of survival at 5-years is acceptable (74.1-96.8%).

Facts About Cracks in Teeth.

Examining the nature of stress distribution within the intact tooth can aid in understanding how natural tooth structures are able to resist mechanical forces during masticatory function. Identification of potential fractures in teeth on clinical examination is essential for correct diagnosis, particularly if there is pulpal involvement. This discussion will consider the different types of fracture, their identification and management. This paper will highlight management of tooth fractures, including identifying prognostic indicators, which are largely dependent on the extent of the fracture within the tooth structure.

Survival rate after endodontic treatment in general dentistry for cracked teeth with different coronal restorations.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to analyse the survival rate of cracked teeth after endodontic treatment. The secondary aim was to compare the survival rate of cracked teeth restored with composite filling/crown and those restored with a full crown. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was conducted retrospectively from three general dental clinics in Stockholm, which are all part of the national dental service organisation. Two-hundred patients with teeth receiving endodontic treatment due to symptomatic cracks were included. The patient data range from year 2001 to 2016. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 48 years (range 29-69). Fifty-five per cent had cracks located above the pulpal cavity, 11% within the pulpal cavity and 3% located in the root canal. The cracks were located most commonly on the proximal surfaces. The survival rate for teeth with cracks was 68% and 54% after 5 and 10 years, respectively. The survival rate was significantly higher (97%) for cracked teeth receiving a full crown after endodontic treatment compared to teeth restored with either a composite filling or composite crown. CONCLUSION: The overall survival rate for cracked teeth was 68% after 5 years, while it was significantly higher for cracked teeth restored with a full crown. The results suggest within the limitations of this study that cracked teeth should be restored with a full crown after endodontic treatment.

Factors Related to the Outcomes of Cracked Teeth after Endodontic Treatment.

INTRODUCTION: Cracked teeth are a common clinical finding; however, their presence renders diagnosis and prognosis unreliable. The purpose of this research was to assess the correlations of multiple factors on the prognosis of cracked teeth that had undergone endodontic treatment. METHODS: A total of 3680 patients who received endodontic treatment by an advanced postdoctoral education program in endodontics with follow-up records of at least 1 year were assessed. From this sample, 62 patients met the inclusion criteria and were included in the final analysis. The factors being evaluated included demographics, clinical symptoms and signs, radiographic findings, and restoration type. Statistical analysis was then completed using the chi-square and Fisher exact tests. RESULTS: The mean follow-up period was 23.3 months, with an overall tooth success rate of 75.8%. The success rates differed significantly when the patient had an existing preoperative periapical lesion, lacked a proper permanent restoration on the treated tooth, or had a post placed after root canal treatment. Data analysis showed that restoring the tooth after endodontic treatment was the single most important factor for prognosis. In fact, the endodontically treated teeth with definitive full-coverage restorations had a 2-year success rate of 93.6%. CONCLUSION: Full-coverage restorations should be considered an important part of the treatment plan for cracked teeth treated endodontically.

Outcomes of endodontically treated cracked teeth: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Systematic review analyzing the treatment outcomes of cracked teeth that received endodontic treatment is unavailable. The purpose of this study was to examine the treatment outcome of cracked teeth that received root canal treatment and to determine factors that influenced outcome. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The specific PIO questions were as follows: Population: patients who were healthy individuals ≥ 18 years old and required root canal treatment due to cracked tooth; Intervention: root canal treatment with at least 1 year in occlusal function; Outcomes: survival rate and pre-operative factors. Ovid, PubMed, and Cochrane databases were searched in conjunction with hand searching. Pooled survival rates were determined from a meta-analysis of the data retrieved from the articles. All statistics were performed by the Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software. RESULTS: Four articles met the inclusion criteria. The overall tooth survival at 60 months was 84.1% (95%CI, 72.3-91.5%). Although no pre-operative factors had statistical significance, 4 factors had possible clinical significance. Teeth with single crack and teeth with cracks contained within crowns exhibited lower extraction risk, while teeth with pre-treatment periodontal probing > 3 mm and teeth that were terminal abutments showed a greater risk of extraction. CONCLUSION: This systematic review determined the survival rate of endodontically treated cracked teeth to be moderately high. More studies in this area are, however, warranted before definitive conclusions can be derived. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: In view of the relatively high survival rate, endodontic treatment rather than extraction should be considered for cracked teeth.

Success and Survival of Endodontically Treated Cracked Teeth with Radicular Extensions: A 2- to 4-year Prospective Cohort.

INTRODUCTION: There are no long-term, prospective clinical studies assessing outcomes of endodontically treated cracked teeth with radicular extensions. The purpose of this prospective study was to examine the 2- to 4-year success and survival rates of endodontically treated, coronally restored, cracked teeth, specifically where the crack extends beyond the level of the canal orifice internally. METHODS: Seventy consecutive teeth requiring endodontic treatment with cracks extending to the level of the canal orifice and up to 5 mm beyond were included in the cohort. Treatment was performed by a single endodontist using current techniques, and cases were followed over time. Specific treatment and posttreatment protocols were used. A tooth was "survived" if it was present, asymptomatic, and functional. The category of "success" was given to a case if strict radiographic and clinical criteria were met. RESULTS: Fifty-nine teeth were eligible for survival analysis, and 53 teeth were available for success analysis. There was a 100% survival rate in the first 2 years and 96.6% survival up to the 4-year period; 90.6% were classified as "success" in the 2- to 4-year term. No significant differences (P < .05) were found for periodontal pocketing (up to 7 mm) at the site of the crack, marginal ridge involvement, crack depth, or pretreatment diagnoses. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that the success and survival rates for cracked teeth with radicular extensions may be similar to endodontically treated teeth in general and may be higher than previously reported in cracked tooth studies. Treatment outcomes in cracked teeth with radicular extensions may be improved by using the following protocols: microscope-assisted intraorifice barriers placed apical to the extent of the crack, complete occlusal reduction, specific postoperative instructions, and expeditious placement of a full-coverage restoration.

Treatment of Cracked Teeth.

Although many options are proposed for the treatment of cracked posterior teeth, most treatment decisions are not evidence based. Thus, considerable individual variation can occur regarding treatment recommendations for the same scenario. To our knowledge, there are no studies in the literature assessing practitioners' attitudes toward the treatment of cracked teeth. This research recorded variations between general practitioners and specialist groups regarding the treatment approaches of cracked teeth. In a cross-sectional structured questionnaire survey, 32 prosthodontists, 34 endodontists, and 29 general practitioners working in public and private dental health services in Kuwait were assessed regarding their treatment approach to 5 different clinical cracked tooth scenarios. Chosen treatment options varied greatly. Within each scenario, there was a wide range in treatment preferences across all groups and within each group, especially with respect to asymptomatic cracked teeth. Overall, treatment approaches did not relate to specialty training. Statistically significant differences were noticed between endodontists and general practitioners, in case of crowning teeth, in scenario 3 (P = .032), and in extracting teeth for scenario 5 (P = .048). This study highlights that, despite suggested guidelines, there are large differences in the approach to treatment planning for cracked teeth by practitioners and specialists, both as a whole and within each group. Further multicountry studies involving larger dental populations are needed to determine factors that influence practitioners' treatment choices and/or whether better or more widely accepted guidelines need to be established. More prospective well-controlled clinical case-based research with long-term follow-ups is required.